oracle Archives • narpm.org

9+ Oracle Email Format Examples: Quick Guide

A structured system for designating electronic correspondence recipients within the Oracle ecosystem, involves adherence to specific naming conventions. Typically, it incorporates a user’s identifier, potentially their name or employee number, followed by the “@” symbol and the organization’s domain name. A sample instantiation might appear as `john.doe@oracle.com` or `employee12345@oracle.com`. The precise structure can vary based on internal organizational policies and subdomain usage.

This standardized approach offers several advantages. It facilitates efficient communication, reduces ambiguity in addressing messages, and aids in maintaining a professional corporate image. Historically, consistent electronic address formats have become increasingly critical for large organizations like Oracle to manage internal and external communications effectively, particularly as the volume of digital correspondence has grown exponentially.

9+ Katz Lacabe v Oracle Email Case: Key Docs & Info

The phrase identifies a specific legal case: Katz, Lacabe, et al. v. Oracle America, Inc. where email communications played a significant role as evidence or subject matter. It pinpoints a dispute involving the named plaintiffs versus Oracle America, Incorporated, and highlights the relevance of electronic mail within the litigation. For example, these emails might have contained crucial contractual agreements, internal discussions revealing intentions, or demonstrable evidence of specific actions relevant to the legal claims.

The importance of this case lies in its potential impact on understanding the legal boundaries concerning electronic communications within corporate environments. Court rulings from such cases can establish precedents, influencing how companies manage internal email systems, protect sensitive information, and handle discovery requests during litigation. The historical context involves the increasing reliance on email for business communication and the subsequent need for legal frameworks to address issues like privacy, data security, and admissibility of electronic evidence.